Kara and I had fun seeing the new show of Seth art at the RICA Gallery here in Guelph last night. We also hung out with some other Seth fans and art buyers after the preview/launch and I was really amazed at the diverse group of people who are into his work. Many have come to him through his "non-comics" paintings and sculptures and his gallery agent Renann Isaacs should take a lot of the credit for turning these folks on to the work and hustling to develop a strong local market (although there were collectors from New York and Toronto on hand and I suspect some long-distance/overseas sales as well). I talked to people who are not comics nerds and who couldn't tell an issue of The Comics Journal from Wizard Magazine from Bubbles (in one discussion about contemporary Canadian figurative painters working in a realist style like Kent Monkman and Atilla Lukacs, the idea of studio assistants came up which led to a discussion of comic book assembly-line production techniques, ghost artists, and manga studios, and I had to bite my tongue a bit when the fellow I was talking to said something like, "Is that how Stan Lee drew his comics?"). Wisely, Renann and Seth created a show of small pictures, priced to sell. They are fun little things, very Seth-y, but as the artist admitted, not much thought went into the titles or artist statement (I'm attaching the local news article for some choice Seth quotes). Which is all to say, a good time was had by all. I think the entire show is going to sell out: most of the paintings were sold by the second night, and the show runs until December 23. I didn't take any pictures, so I'm stealing the photos from Renann's Facebook feed for those who aren't friends with her.
Sunday, November 26, 2023
SETH'S POSTCARDS
Wednesday, October 18, 2023
Graphic Novel Review: Palookaville #24
Palookaville #24
by Seth
(D&Q, 2023)
112 pages, Hardcover
review by BK Munn
This latest issue of the semi-annual hardcover version of Seth's long-running comic is chockfull of value for money: the fourth chapter of his teenage memoir, a selection of five gorgeous themed short stories from his sketchbook, and a photo essay section devoted to the making of Luc Chamberland's film of "The Apology of Albert Batch," a puppet show created by Seth, included as a dvd with this issue.
Wednesday, August 02, 2023
DAVE SIM ON KIRBY'S FOURTH WORLD
Dave Sim writing in CANAR #1, 1972:
"KIRBY VIEW --This is to serve as a kind of response to Rick Seiler's Kirby 'opinionations' in this same issue.
I maintain that Kirby has little or no talent. His writing disgusts me even more than the work of early Gerry Conway. His creations seem to be of less than human quality. He is at his best designing a fight sequence, and he knows it. Thus, most of his books become little more than twenty odd pages of villains getting their heads caved in while the hero rants and raves over his cause with no emotion at all. Kirby's characters never seem to come alive. One cannot picture ever seeing an human qualities in Orion. And don't mistake human qualities for qualities found in other Kirby creations (Black Bolt, Silver Surfer, etc.) for they are equally monotonous in their steadfast gazes and intent close-mouthed convictions.
The Fourth World 'epics' failed for one reason. None of the books had anything that could rationally be called a uniting force. What they amounted to was a mish-mash of characters who exist for battle, use the Earth as a battleground and seldom say more tha two words without a) punching b) killing c) disintegrating an opponent who is equally mute.
Now for some conclusions on this topic. Why do these characters exist? They are Kirby creations and it is a well-known fact that the only way to maintain Jack Kirby as a staff artist is to cater to his wants. One of these wants is total freedom to change, distort, or completely destroy anything in the panel art at DC. He changed Superman into something less than he should be, totally demolished anything it took DC thirty years to build Jimmy Olsen into ... and left both characters when he was through with them. This is somewhat reminiscent of ushering a spoiled child into a room of antique toys, permitting him to smash them at will and guiding him to another room.
Now, the almighty King demands that he be granted a team of artists at his California headquarters that he might continue his Fourth World Farce. Whom would he take? Neal Adams? Jim Aparo? Joe Kubert? Certainly sacrificing these gentlemen to the pseudo science fiction slop of the Fourth World means nothing ... if the King is satiated by it. "
___
*Dave Sim writing as a 16-year-old fanboy for his friend John Balge's fanzine Comic Art News and Reviews. This early column proves that Sim has always had bad taste and his head up his ass.
Sunday, July 23, 2023
Graphic Novel Review: Abysmalation by Josh Bayer
Abysmalation
by Josh Bayer
(Birdcage Bottom, 2022)
148pgs
Fantastic collection of fugitive pieces by this punk cartoonist includes the very funny "Bloggers" series of strips, some autobiographical shorts and playful explorations of comics history, and the epic centrepiece "I'm Drawing Garfield." It's a showcase for Bayer's expressive, gestural, beautifully "messy" cartooning; an intense style with a radical personal approach to everything from page design, to figure drawing, to lettering. Recommended!
Saturday, July 15, 2023
Phyllis Wright, 1930-2023
Friday, April 28, 2023
Close Shaves in the Comics, Part 2: Storm Gets a Mohawk!
by BK Munn
Tuesday, April 25, 2023
Unknown Canadian Cartoonist: Joe Cushner
by BK Munn
Unknown Canadian Cartoonists: Joe Cushner
Saturday, February 11, 2023
SPLIT-FACE vs. TWO-FACE: A TALE OF TWO VILLAINS FROM BATMAN AND DICK TRACY
Just saw the first Dick Tracy movie (1945) on TCM. The villain is Split-Face, played by the great Mike Mazurki. He's a new creation for the movie, not from the comic strip, created by the screenwriter Eric Taylor, author of many B-movie crime pictures. The Batman villain Two-Face debuted in 1942. In a shocking twist, it looks like Dick Tracy is taking a page from Batman. In another shocking twist, Bob Kane is actually credited with his creation (although Bill Finger of course wrote the first appearance in Detective Comics #66). In a twist that will surprise nobody, Kane stole the idea for Two-Face from this poster for the 1941 Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde starring Spencer Tracy
Sunday, January 15, 2023
THE FIRST COMICS ACADEMIC IN FILM? SORRELL BOOKE IN "BYE BYE BRAVERMAN"
by BK MUNN
Is this the first comics academic in film? Sorrell Booke as Holly Levine in "Bye Bye Braverman" (1968, d. Sidney Lumet). In the film, about four writers trying to find their friend's funeral in Brooklyn, Holly announces that he will soon be teaching a course on pop culture, called "From Little Nemo to L'il Abner". This news invites incredulity from his fellow intellectuals, who proceed to quiz him on his comic strip knowledge, asking trivia questions about Little Annie Rooney, Winnie Winkle, The Gumps, Orphan Annie, and Don Winslow of the Navy. Holly passes with flying colours, only getting hung up on the name of the dunce character in The Rinkydinks gang (Denny Dimwit). The film has many other comics references, including mentions of Dick Tracy, Skeezix, Blondie, and Bringing Up Father. Holly has a pop art painting of The Phantom in his apartment, and a Sunday of Irwin Hasen's Dondi is glimpsed at one point. It's a charming comedy in the form of a Joycean odyssey, based on the book "To An Early Grave" by Wallace Markfield (aka "The James Joyce of Brighton Beach").
WEDNESDAY, SEASON ONE
WEDNESDAY, SEASON 1 (2022)
review by BK MUNN
When I was a kid, like everybody I watched reruns of The Addams Family on tv. In retrospect, it’s amazing that the show existed at all, a family sitcom based on some macabre, downright antisocial and perverse cartoons printed in the high-toned New Yorker magazine, but in the context of the times it doesn’t seem out of place. The post-Kennedy, post-Cuban Missile crisis 1960s was a time of high-concept tv shows with increasingly fantastical premises (and The Munsters premiered at the same time, for Christ’s sake). As a show, it still holds up as a goofy, only partly moronic example of 60s culture. They made some good logical decisions, shoe-horning Charles Addams’ disconnected cartoons into a network format, essentially bowdlerizing it for a mainstream audience (not that The New Yorker isn’t mainstream, but you know what I mean). It’s no smarter than Gilligan’s Island or Hogan’s Heroes, and it’s not without its own boring, repetitive schticks and annoying tics, but it lucked out with a few things, like a catchy theme song, great casting, and some creative characterizations that paid off. And for better or for worse, sixty years later the tv show is still the basis for a massive pop culture enterprise.
As an adult I think of the work of Charles Addams, including the roughly 150 cartoons and drawings he did that can be at least tangentially identified as “Addams Family” cartoons, as something like a holy text, my Bible or Shakespeare, and in many ways the epitome of comics art. I have to admit I’m a bit snobbish about them, and hold them close to my heart (I’m sure Addams was much less precious and, like Charles Schulz, was happy to cash any checks for prostituting his creations). These days, I think of the tv shows and movies as, at best, easily-forgettable aspects of the Addams legacy and, at worst, as something like a hideous boil on the face of the Mona Lisa (maybe like something you’d find in the Addams Family portrait gallery?). That being said, I’m still able to think about the original drawings and their ancillary spinoffs as separate things, and have even watched parts of the movie franchises over the years with a clean conscience (as a kid I also liked the Hanna-Barbera Saturday morning animated show!).
Like all pop-culture properties, The Addams Family has been seized on as something endlessly franchise-able, to be mined and re-imagined and transformed into a myriad of formats and genres; a universe (dare I say multiverse?) unto itself. Our modern sophisticated tastes demand more than some Boomer artifact, and so we have this new Wednesday show, which takes one of the least-developed, most projected-upon, parts of the universe, essentially a blank slate, and posits her as a teen heroine in a sort of Harry Potter meets Nancy Drew milieu, as a goth Hermione, if you will, in one of these now stereotypical fantasy private schools. The slow addition of *actual* supernatural aspects to the "mythos", above and beyond Addams’ bedrock surrealism, placed front and center, is the novelty here, giving some kind of superpowers to all members of the clan, and special precognitive witchiness to both Morticia and Wednesday, etc. (The full scale “magic-ization” I think very clearly takes away from what made the original concepts unique, but whatever.) I turned off most of my grumpy critical nitpicking and enjoyed this (almost too long) short series. The casting was mostly good, the plots not too moronic (gleefully full of plot-holes, lacunae, and “traveling at the speed of plot” tv tropes), and overall those things I expected to dislike (dancing to The Cramps, Fred Armisen as Uncle Fester) instead were almost charming. It’s for kids but I’m adult enough to admit I’m basically a big baby and we live in an infantile society. Tim Burton, who has been making shit like this his entire career, had a hand in production and development, and directs half the episodes (the poster says this conglomeration of cliches and half-assed plots comes "from the imagination of Tim Burton" which is quite the self-own but also, which part?), and I can’t really say I hate it.








































.jpg)


